ACADEMY OF MARXISM CHINESE ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
中文
Home>English>Scholars’ Profiles
Marx’s Inquiry into the Birth of Capitalism: Why Does It Matter?
     Release time: 2021-03-18

 

John Milios

Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece

 

ABSTRACT

Differing approaches to the issue of the beginnings of capitalism imply different conceptualization of what capitalism is. This paper elaborates on the notion of original accumulation. It utilizes the Marxist notion of the mode of production to provide the concept of the historical figure which Marx describes as the pre-capitalist money-owner. Two notions are introduced: (1) The moneybegetting slave mode of production, existing since antiquity and clearly distinguishing itself from the classical slave mode of production; (2) the contractual money-begetting mode of production that emerged in the middle ages in relation to financial schemes based on partnerships or associations. The taskmaster of each of these two pre-capitalist modes of production is a precapitalist money-owner. His later “confrontation and contact” with the labourer who has become a proletarian is finally discussed. Original accumulation is not primitive developed or humane capitalist accumulation, but the transformation of pre-capitalist social relations into capitalist social relations. No version of capitalism is the realm of democracy, freedom, or justice. Capitalism is a social system in which direct coercion guaranteeing economic exploitation of the ruled by the rulers is incorporated into the economic relation itself. “Freedom” is the form of appearance of a historically specific system of class domination and exploitation. 

 

KEYWORDS

Original accumulation; modes of production; Marx; capitalism as a social system

Related Articles