Jeffery L. Nicholas

Department of Philosophy, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA

ABSTRACT

For over sixty years, Alasdair MacIntyre has written on the challenges to human flourishing, first as a Marxist and Christian and now as a Thomistic-Aristotelian who insists on the need to read Marx. He has criticized Stalinist Marxism and political liberalism because both rest on autonomous morality, or the divorce of “is” from “ought.” In his mature work, he proposes the concept of practices as a way to unite “is” and “ought” and resist emotivism/expressivism. His theory faces certain weaknesses: the refusal to engage with nation-state politics and of the problem of authoritarianism and a lack of discussion of the domination of nature. Regardless, MacIntyre’s Aristotelianism provides resources in its defense of local communities, its understanding of practices, and its continuous critique of liberalism. Utopian and left thinkers would serve their project best by engaging with MacIntyre’s analysis of autonomous morality, without which we will fail to advance utopian causes.

ARTICLE HISTORY

Received 19 June 2018

Revised 9 May 2019

Accepted 11 June 2019

KEYWORDS

Alasdair MacIntyre; autonomous morality; practices; desire; utopian thought

From: International Critical Thought 2019 9 (3)

Editor: Wang Yi